Ask Dr. Christensen: When are double-arch impressions better than full-arch impressions for crowns?

May 8, 2015
Dr. Gordon Christensen shares his extensive clinical knowledge through short videos. This week he talks about why double-arch impressions are better than full-arch impressions for crowns in some situations, even though they often are not taught in dental school.

Dr. Christensen assumes most dentists didn’t learn anything about double-arch impressions in dental school. Yet research shows that for one or two units, double-arch impressions are better than full-arch impressions. He displays two of the better double-arch trays on the market today. Both have many of the same excellent qualities.

Dr. Christensen concludes that for one or two restorations, a double-arch impression, assuming the occlusion is adjusted well before you use the tray, is better by far than full-arch impressions.

He tells dentists, "Do NOT feel second-class using double-arch impressions." While full-arch is definitely indicated at three units and above, or in some special situations, double-arch impressions are excellent for one or two units.

Watch the video for more information.

To watch this video on an iOS device, click here.

To watch more videos from Dr. Gordon Christensen, click here.